Skip to main content

Full text of "Search for CP Violation and New Physics at CLEO"

See other formats


Search for CPV and New Physics at CLEO^ 



Vladimir Savinov (CLEO Collaboration) 
School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pittsburgh 
3941 O'Hara St., Pittsburgh PA USA 15260 
vps3@pitt.edu, www. phyast .pitt .edu/~ savinov 



O 

(N 



Abstract 

Recent CLEO results on the search for CP violation in decays of B and D mesons 
' and r lepton are reviewed. New data on "wrong-sign" D decays and B K^*h+l- 

FCNC transitions are presented. As possible Standard Model contribution to many of 
studied processes is tiny, described efforts constitute the search for physics beyond the 
^ ' Standard Model. Future CLEO-c efforts on the subject are outlined. 

O' 
^ ■ 

1 Introduction 

The ultimate goal of many current and future efforts in experimental physics of elementary 
^ _ particles is discovering possible new symmetries in Nature. These symmetries, commonly 
O ■ referred to as the "new physics" could realize via previously unknown interactions that 
O ■ we are becoming sensitive to with novel detecting devices at collider-based experiments as 
the energies available to these machines are growing. Besides academic curiosity about 
the processes that might be allowed beyond the current energy frontier, there are many 
X I important questions that are outside the scope of the Standard Model (SM) of elementary 
particles. Among these are quantifying the imbalance between matter and antimatter in 
visible Universe, why there are three generations of quarks and leptons in the SM hierarchy, 
^ . what is the connection between two fundamental statistics, if quarks and leptons are truly 
point-like particles and other open problems. Last but not the least, I have to mention that 
^ ; we have not yet obtained the experimental proof of the origin of mass, neither we know if the 
' Coulomb's law holds at very small distances and if there is any connection between gravity 
^ and possible extra dimensions. 

The results presented in this short review were obtained from the data collected at 
the Cornell Electron Storage Ring (CESR) with the CLEO series of detectors. These results 
are based on statistics that correspond to an integrated e+e~ luminosity of up to 9.2 fb~^ 
collected at the T(4S) energy of 10.58 GeV and up to 4.6 fb~^ collected approximately 60 
MeV below the T(4S) energy. These energies are far below the energies available at Tevatron, 
LEP and future LHC experiments, however, the tiny effects of new physics at such low 
energies could be amplified by strong interaction that might give rise, for example, to direct 
CP asymmetry in particular decays of B and D mesons. The measurements described in 
this review are, most of the time, the limits on how rare the searched-for processes are. 
Presenting our experimental results in the form of limits on masses, coupling constants 
and other parameters associated with the new physical processes is highly mo del- dependent 



^ Based on invited talks on behalf of CLEO Collaboration at international conferences Kaon'2001 {CP- 
2001), Pisa, Italy and EPS-2001 (HEP-2001), Budapest, Hungary. 



1 



and is left outside the scope of this review. Only more recent CLEO efforts are described, 
while neutrinoless|T|] and anomalous radiative^ r decays, rare rj' decaysQ, familonQ, scalar 
bottom quark[^ and other searches are not covered here. For some of the processes studied 
by CLEO and reviewed here similar or better limits were recently reported by BaBar and 
Belle experiments. 

Our data sample was recorded with two configurations of the CLEO detector. The 
first third of the data was recorded with the CLEO II detector which consisted of three 
cylindrical drift chambers placed in an axial solenoidal magnetic field of 1.5T, a CsI(Tl)- 
crystal electromagnetic calorimeter, a time-of-flight (TOF) plastic scintillator system and 
a muon system (proportional counters embedded at various depths in the steel absorber). 
Two thirds of the data were taken with the CLEO II. V configuration of the detector where 
the innermost drift chamber was replaced by a silicon vertex detector]^ (SVX) and the 
argon-ethane gas of the main drift chamber was changed to a helium-propane mixture. This 
upgrade led to improved resolutions in momentum and specific ionization energy loss (dE/dx) 
measurements. 

The three-tier CLEO trigger system complemented by the software filter for beam- 
gas rejection utilized the information from the two outer drift chambers, the TOF system 
and electromagnetic calorimeter. The response of the detector was modeled with a GEANT- 
basedQ Monte Carlo (MC) simulation program. The data and simulated samples were 
processed by the same event reconstruction program. Whenever possible the efficiencies 
were either calibrated or corrected for the difference between simulated and actual detector 
responses using direct measurements from independent data. 

Most of the measurements reviewed here have been made by first measuring signal 
candidates yields and then, when necessary, subtracting background contributions. These 
"yields" were not always the numbers of events, often these were complicated weighted 
quantities optimized for signal-background separation. Simple "slice and dice" or counting 
method was employed in simpler analyses, more sophisticated techniques, such as maximum 
likelihood (ML) fitting, neural nets and optimal observable method were applied to more 
difficult cases. The resulting numbers were corrected for the overall efficiencies and then 
converted to the measured quantities using luminosities, branching fractions and, when nec- 
essary, theoretical input. Detailed description of these procedures can be found in references 
to CLEO publications. The reader can also find relevant theoretical references in these pub- 
lications. Our results are based on 9.6 million BB events, 12.2 million t~^t~ pairs and 9 
fm~^ of e+e~ statistics with SVX appropriate for precise D mesons measurements. 



2 Bound on CP Asymmetry in 6 ^ 57 Decays 

The theory 1 10 1 predicts very small Acp asymmetry in inclusive rate for b ^ s'j whereQ 

T{b — > S7) — r(6 — > 57) 



CP 



r(6-> 57) + r(6^ 57)' 



In SM non-zero Acp could arise from QCD radiative corrections and interference among 
processes whose amplitudes are driven by cj (QED penguin), C2 (four-fermion) and cg (QCD 

^Similar definitions of Acp are used in all other analyses reviewed here. 



2 



penguin) Wilson coefficients in OEP expansion for effective weak Hamiltonian. This asym- 
metry is proportional to and could be enhanced by some new processes that would modify 
effective theory. As with all other direct CP asymmetries discussed here, possible non-zero 
Acp in 6 — i> S7 should vanish when summing over all B (or, separately, over all B) decays 
is performed. This is required to conserve CPT and means equal lifetimes for a particle and 
corresponding antiparticle. 

In our analyses[0, the signature of 6 — *■ 57 is high energy photon: 2.2 GeV < 
< 2.7 GeV. To measure partial rates, flavor tagging is necessary. We achieved 89% and 
90% correct 6-flavor tagging by either using a high momentum lepton from the recoiling, 
non-signal B meson candidate, or, when lepton is not identified, with the help of pseudore- 
construction technique where charged kaon candidate was used for tagging. The effects of 
BB mixing were corrected for, substantial background from continuum processes (including 
initial state radiation (ISR)) was suppressed using 7r° and i] vetoes and a combination of 
kinematic variables provided as the input to neural net trained using signal MC and back- 
ground samples. The remaining background was subtracted using independent data sample 
recorded ~ 60 MeV below BB threshold. 

We do not tag strangeness in 6 — > 57 (even when using pseudoreconstruction tech- 
nique) because of three reasons: there is no kaon requirement in lepton flavor tagging method, 
our PID is far from being perfect in pseudoreconstruction method, and, finally, KK pairs 
could be popped up from vacuum after b ^ d'y quark-level transition thus faking the b s'y 
signal. As the result our b ^ s'y and b ^ d'j efficiencies are almost the same. This is 
acceptable because the theory predicts that b ^ d'j contributes only ^ 4% to the inclusive 



radiative rate. To estimate the b ^ d'y contribution from data we performed searches[13, 14 



for certain exclusive channels (such as i? ^ p7 and B D*^'y) that would be coming 
from B decays mediated via QED b ^ d'y penguin, W annihilation and W exchange and 
did not find these processes to have unexpectedly large branching fractions. However, our 
experimental limits on b —>■ dj are still approx. 10 times higher than what we would love 
to see as the experimental proof of 6 — > ^7 being small. Therefore, we assume b ^ sj 
after subtracting all known contributions. As the result our measured b ^ sj asymmetry is 
biased by possible small contribution from b d'-f that would give rise to Acp asymmetry 
of opposite (to signal) sign. 

We measureflTI Acp = (-0.079 ± 0.108 ± 0.022)(1.0 ± 0.03), where the ffist and 
second errors are statistical and additive systematic (same convention is used for all analyses 
reviewed here), and the 3% error is multiplicative systematic. Major contributions to sys- 
tematics arise from mistag rate, continuum and BB background subtractions. Contribution 
from particle detection biases (matter-antimatter detection efficiency asymmetry) for kaons, 
pions and leptons is very small (less than 1%) as it is in all other analyses reported here. 
We also established a 90% confidence level (CL) interval —0.27 < Acp < +0.10 ruling out 
some extreme (though unspecified) non-SM predictions. 



3 Exclusive QED Penguins and CP Asymmetry 

Prompted by theoretical expectation of non-zero Acp in inclusive b ^ sj CLEO also 
measured this asymmetry in exclusive channels B i^* (892)7. In this case flavor self- 
tagging was achieved using charged kaon or pion and it was assumed that Acp is the same 



3 



for neutral and charged B mesons depending only on b quark flavor. We measured [|14 
-^cp = +0.01 it 0.06, where only statistical error is shown (in this review we usually do not 
show systematics for statistics-limited measurements). To obtain this number we corrected 
for misidentification rate of ~ 3.5%. 

4 CP Asymmetry in Dileptons from BB Decays 

Same-sign dileptons appear naturally in T{AS) —>■ B^B^ decays because of BB mixing. 
Similarly to neutral kaon decays, B mass and flavor eigenstates could be different with the 



former described in terms of the latter as [(1 + 6^)5° + (1 — eB)B^]l ^2{1 + le^P). This 
could give rise to CP violation {CPV) that would manifest itself in a non-zero value for 

^ N{in^)-N{l-l-) ^ mejes) 
" N{l+l+) + N{l~l~) ^ l + |ei3|2' ^ ' 

where index I stands for a lepton from semileptonic B decay. 

Experimental challenges in this analysis include measuring dilution factor and the 
charge asymmetry in the fake probability from the data, continuum suppression and sub- 
traction. Only high-momentum leptons are used in the measurement: 1.6 GeV/c < pi < 
2.4 GeV/c. In this analysisfll we measured an = (+0.013 ± 0.050 ± 0.005)(1.00 ± 0.10). 
By combining this result with our previous (statistically independent) measurement |1 6| 
(where BB mixing was the main subject) we arrive at weighted average TZe{eB)/{l + 
|ep) = +0.0035 ± 0.0103 ± 0.0015. This is signiflcant improvement in comparison to CDF 



result +0.025 ± 0.062 ± 0.032. Our sensitivity is similar to that of OPAL's resuh[||]: 
+0.002 ± 0.007 ± 0.003. In contrast to these two measurements our analysis is not affected 
by possible Bg contamination as these mesons can not be produced at energies available to 
us at T(4S). 

5 Search for CP Violation in B ^ ip^'^K Decays 

Possible SM contribution to direct CP asymmetry in B^ — ^ ip^'^'K^ decays is practically zero. 
However, some SM extensions would be able to explain non-zero Acp (if observed). These 
are 2HDM extensions [|l^] where t quark plays a special role and masses of up- and down-type 
fermions are generated by different Higgs doublets. Presence of dileptons from ■j/'^') decays 
allows a background-free analysis and we measured[^] Acp{B^ — > ipK^) = +0.018±0.043± 
0.004 and AcpiB^ ip'K^) = +0.02 ± 0.091 ± 0.01. These two channels are not combined 
together because rescattering that would give rise to FSI and CP-conserving strong phase 
necessary for observing the effects of (CP non-conserving) new physics is channel-dependent. 



6 CP Asymmetries in Charmless Hadronic B Decays 



We also measured[^ Acp for flve two-body charmless hadronic B decays. The theory p2| 



predicts Acp < 0.1 for these decays assuming factorization and no soft FSI. The non-zero 
SM Acp arises from the interference between tree b ^ u and penguin b ^ s transitions. 



4 



There are indications that their amphtudes in studied B decays are comparable, therefore 
(assuming large strong phase) Acp might be observable with existing data. Once again, if 
there is new physics contribution in the quark-level transitions for decays of heavy flavors 
and FSI (or rescattering) is large, Acp could be much larger. Using self-tagging we found 
AcpiB K^n^) = -0.04 ± 0.16, AcpiB K^-k^) = -0.29 ± 0.23, AcpiB K^^) = 
+0.18 ± 0.24, AcpiB K^rl) = +0.03 ± 0.12 and AcpiB un^) = -0.34 ± 0.25, where 
only statistical errors are shown. The interpretation of these results, consistent with the 
SM predictions, would be subject to FSI contribution uncertainties even if some Acp were 
established to be non-zero. As in many other analyses where SM CPV is allowed, it is 
strong interaction that would make (possible) new physics effects to realize at low energies, 
while quantifying its role in extracting parameters associated with these effects could be very 
difficult. 



7 Search for CP Violation in r Decays 

In contrast to charmless B decays, no SM CP violation is possible in r sector and our 
previous search |2^ did not find any in our — ^ K'^ir^u data. Since than we realized that 
a more powerful search is possible using the optimal observable method[|^. This method 
is based on presenting the data in the form most sensitive to a particular SM extension. 
We did not find CP violation in our new — > vr^vr^z/ analysis[^] and, analyzing our data 
using a particular 3HDM SM extension [|26| established a 90% CL interval on the parameter A 



that describes convoluted complex combination of this model's coupling constants: —0.046 < 
Tm(A) < 0.022. In this model r can also decay via charged Higgs boson. We also reanalyzed 
K^n^p data in the same spirit and measured p7| —0.155 < Xm(A) < 0.047 90% CL 



interval (preliminary result). Our new results are obtained using conservative form-factor 
model for hadronic part of studied r decays. Namely, we experimented with three models 
for form factors and chose the one that generated smallest strong phase (thus reducing our 
potential sensitivity to hidden new physics). 



8 CP Violation in D Decays to Pseudoscalar Pairs 

We measured Acp for five decay channels: Acp{D K+R-) = +0.0005 ± 0.0218 ± 
0.0084 and Acp{D tt+tt") = +0.020 ± 0.032 ± 0.008 (preliminary resuhs|28|), Acp{D 
K^n°) = +0.001 ± 0.013, AcpiD ir^^) = +0.001 ± 0.048 and Acp{D i^K) = 
—0.23 ± 0.19, where only statistical errors are shown for the last three channels ||29|| . In 
these analyses d flavor was tagged by the charge of pion from two-body decay D*^ n^D^ 
(and charge-conjugate). Assuming that D* decay is CP-conserving, to measure Acp for 
D mesons we actually measure the numbers of D*^ {D*~) decays followed by the (D^) 
decay. Possible non-zero Acp would be manifestation of direct CP violation which is usually 



predicted to be small in SM, of the order of 0.1% in the charmed mesons sector||3^. However 



there are indications that large FSI effects are present in D decays and this would make 



them an excellent place to search for CP violation with more data expected at CLE0-c[31|. 



5 



9 New Fits to Proper Time and y Measurement 

The first two Acp measurements for cliarmed mesons described above are actually a by- 
product of tlie new analysis of proper time measured with CLEO II. V SVX by recon- 
structing the displaced vertices of the mesons decaying in flight. Proper time measure- 
ments provide us with information on DD mixing that can proceed via on-shell and off-shell 
intermediate states. In a widely accepted framework the amplitude for former (latter) con- 
tribution is —iy (x) in units of roo/2. The signatures of new physics include \x\ » \y\ 
and possible large \T'm{x)/x\ causing CP violating interference between x and y or between 
X and direct decay amplitudes to the same final state. SM x contribution to DD mixing 
is strongly Cabibbo-suppressed: |x| ~ tan^ 6'c ~ 5% and this is reduced further down to 
|x| ~ 10~^-10~^ by GIM cancelation where large uncertainty is due to strong interaction 
effects. In the limit of no CP violation in D^ decays, one can measure y by comparing 
distributions of decay distances {i.e. by measuring proper times) for samples of D^ mesons 
decaying to CP eigenstates and to the states of mixed CP. We measured[^ proper times 
for D° decays to K~^K^, tt+tt^ and K^7t~ final states and obtained preliminary result 
y = —0.011 ± 0.025 ± 0.014 which is consistent with zero. This is in agreement with our 



previous measurement [ 32 1 and recent FOCUS results[33 



10 First Measurement of K^n tt" Rate 

Charmed meson initially tagged as D^ can be observed in a "wrong-sign" (WS) final state, 
such as fC+vr^vr^ as the result of direct doubly Cabibbo-suppressed decay (DCSD) or via a 
"right-sign" (RS) D'^ decay after mixing. In this analysis[0 we measure time-integrated 

T(D^ ^ K+TT-TT^) I x'^ + v'^ 

R{K..) = ^1^0 ^ K.^J^ = ^-(^--) + y^M^y' + (3) 

where Ro{K7[tt) is the relative rate of DCSD for this channel, x' = xcos6 + ysm6, y' = 
y cos 6 — X sin 6 and 5 is a possible strong phase between direct and mixing-induced WS 
amplitudes. 

We measure R{K7T7t) from the two-dimensional ML fit in m{KTiTi) vs. Q = Mu* — 
Mk-k-k—^-k and use the results to establish the WS decay. From our binned ML fit we measure 
R^K-k-k) = 0.0043lo;ooij!)±0.0007. With more statistics we could have made a time-dependent 
fit to extract x', y' and RdIKitit) simultaneously (although with correlations), however, with 
our data (observing 38 ± 9 WS Kirn events) we can only measure RnlKirn) = (1.7 ± 0.4 ± 
0.3) X tan^6'c assuming no mixing. If, instead, we assumed 6{K7m) = 6{K7i) (unfounded), 
y' = and = 0.028 (using 95% CL upper limit from our previous measurement [l32[| ) , 
these changes would have had very small effect on our Ro^Ktiti) result. 



11 New Results on FCNC Decays B K^*H+l- 

Processes mediated by (effective, in SM) Flavor Changing Neutral Currents (FCNC) are 
among the best candidates to search for new physics in B decays. Field-theoretical descrip- 
tion of FCNC decays contains loop and box diagrams and this would make it easy to explain 



6 



deviations from SM (if observed) by introducing much heavier non-SM particles that would 
affect the total rate and modify differential distributions for these decays. 

Background suppression is one of the challenges present in this analysis. In addi- 
tion to continuum (includes ISR) there are dileptons from ijj^'^ and BB decays. Almost all 
background-suppression variables and methods developed on CLEO are combined to achieve 
the best possible sensitivity in our blind analysis that uses 12 e~^e~ and fi~^fi~ exclusive chan- 
nels. To make ■ip^'"' suppression efficient we correct their four momenta to include internal 
and external bremsstrahlung photons (when recovered) and apply wide vetoes on invariant 
masses. For example, in e+e~ channels we veto candidates with (corrected, when applica- 
ble) dielectron invariant masses in the range between 2.80 and 3.23 GeV. To suppress BB 
dileptons we employ missing mass technique developed on CLEO for neutrino "detection" . 
Careful studies of e and /i reconstruction efficiencies using data have been carried over the 
past two years and this is the reason why our new FCNC results became available only 
recently. To suppress virtual K*'y contribution we select events with dilepton invariant mass 
mil > 0.5 GeV/c^ in the K* analyses. Continuum background is suppressed using Fisher 
discriminant that combines all available kinematic information about each B candidate and 
the event as a whole. In each channel selection criteria were optimized for the discovery and 
best upper limit with the average used in the actual analysis. This gave us overall (weighted) 
efficiency of 54.8%. 

Summing over all channels we counted the number of observed events in the signal 
box of beam-constrained B mass vs. AE, the difference between the beam energy and that of 
a candidate and found 7 events while our data-based estimates of background contribution is 



5.8±0.8. As the result we achieved excellent sensitivity and measured]^] 90% CL (Bayesian) 
upper limits for B branching fractions 

B{B KI+1-) < 1.7 X 10-^ 
B{B ^ i^*(892)/+r)„„>o.5 Gov < 3.2 x 10-^ and 
[0.65-B(5 ^ Kl+l~) + 0.35S(5 ^ is:*(892)/+/~)„„>o.5 gcv] < 1-5 x 10-^ 



where the latter efficiency-weighted limit is just 50% above the SM prediction[^ with almost 
no model dependence in the efficiency. We estimate that to become actually sensitive to new 
physics contribution in these decays data samples of the order of 500 fb~^ might be necessary. 



12 Future r-charm Factory at Cornell 

At future CLEO-c experiment [^j we plan to use the existing CLEO III apparatus with silicon 
vertex detector replaced by a compact low-mass inner drift chamber. This detector will 
collect data at the J /if) and e"''e~ DD threshold energies with initial CESR-c instantaneous 
luminosity around 3-5 x 10'^^ cm^^ s^^. CLEO-c will operate with reduced magnetic field 
(down to 1.0 Tesla from 1.5 Tesla at present, this only requires turning a knob) in the main 
part of the detector. At CLEO-c we plan to collect samples of 1.5 million DgDg pairs, 30 
million DD pairs and 1 billion J/ip decays. These exceed the MARK-III statistics by the 
factors of 480, 310 and 170, respectively. 

An important element of our CLEO-c program is to measure the D mesons cou- 
phng constants that are important for testing Lattice QCD (LQCD) predictions. If these 
predictions are confirmed by the measurements, there would be a degree of confidence in 



7 



LQCD calculations for Jb- Then the theory could be used to reduce hadronic uncertainties 
in future measurements of CKM matrix elements at 5-factories and Fermilab. Reducing 
hadronic uncertainties in CKM measurements should help to "over-constrain" the unitarity 
triangles thus possibly leading to hints of new physics contribution to the decays of heavy 
mesons. The measurements of /d(^) coupling constants will be done at CLEO-c by precisely 
measuring the rates for the D ^ W and Dg W decays. The main advantage of CLEO-c 
will be the abihty to "tag" the signal D meson decaying leptonically by fully reconstructing 
the recoiling D and by detecting a lepton from signal D decay. Applying kinematic con- 
straints will help to bring the neutrino "detection" technique to a quahtatively better level 
than is possible on CLEO at present in B decays. According to our estimates we should 
be able to achieve the 2% precision in the measurements of /d and fo^- At present these 
are known with 35% and 100% errors, respectively. We also plan to measure many other D 
branching fractions with much better precision than these are known at present. Knowledge 
of these branching fractions, such as B{D — > Kn) is important for normahzing measurements 
at higher energies. 

In our future DD mixing and CP asymmetries studies we should benefit from the fact 
that D and D at CLEO-c will be produced in a coherent quantum state. This is crucial for 
direct CP searches we plan to undertake. The key point is that when a DD pair is produced 
in a C-odd initial state from e+e" annihilation, a final state with two CP eigenstates of the 
same CP eigenvalue would be an unambiguous manifestation of direct CP violation. As the 
result of our CLEO-c program we expect to achieve the precision of better than 1% in the 
measurements of DD mixing and Acp asymmetry parameter for D mesons. 

The decays of J/ip will be studied at CLEO-c with an unprecedented precision and 
in much detail. Our main emphasis here would be on studying radiative decays of J/ip 
to light mesons as these provide a glue-rich experimental laboratory where new states of 
hadronic matter, generally referred to as glueballs and exotics could be finally unambiguously 
discovered and studied. With one billion J/ ip decays we will be able to perform partial wave 
analyses and global fits for many mysterious decays of J/ip (such as J/ip — > 7/j(2220)) 
presumably observed previously, however, with poor statistics. 

The measurements of R, the total hadronic cross section in e'^e" annihilation in a wide 
range of e+e" invariant masses (VS) proposed at CLEO-c is an integral part of global efi^orts 
in heavy flavor physics. These measurements will help to reduce uncertainties associated with 
extracting new physics effects from existing and future data at higher energies experiments. 
By measuring 7^ in a wide range of we should be able to further constrain the mass of 
the (minimal) SM Higgs. In this case, the analysis of TZ would result in the measurement of 
running a (electromagnetic) that should allow to put more restrictive limits on the mass of 
SM Higgs if it is not yet discovered by the time CLEO-c data is available. Finally, precise 
scan of TZ might give information about vector hybrids, i.e. hadrons consisting of qqg whose 
existence is predicted by LQCD calculations. The latter project's feasibility would depend 
on the magnitudes of e'^e" partial widths of such hypothetic resonances. We expect to 
achieve the 2% precision per point in the measurements of R at CLEO-c in the invariant 
mass region between 3 and 5 GeV. CESR-c will have the ability to run with a single beam 
energy of up to 5.6 GeV thus opening the prospects to do the measurements at even higher 
V^. As relevant for R measurements we are especially interested in region above J/ijj 
and below T resonances. CESR-c and CLEO-c is a three-year program that is expected to 
start in the end of 2002. 



8 



13 Conclusions and Acknowledgments 

CLEO has searched for a variety of CP asymmetries, "wrong-sign" D*^ decays and B decays 
mediated by FCNC transitions with the purpose to probe the non-SM physics. No evidence 
of such contribution was found. More precise measurements are starting coming from other 
B physics experiments, better hmits on or the discovery of DD mixing and CP violation 
in D decays should be expected at these facilities and at future r-charm factory at Cornell 
(CLEO-c and CESR-c). 

I would like to thank the CESR staff for providing us with excellent luminosity and 
my CLEO colleagues who gave me a chance to represent our experiment. 

References 

[1] CLEO Collab., S. Ahmed et al, Phys. Rev. D61, 071101 (2000); 
CLEO Collab., D. Bliss et a/., Phys. Rev. D57, 5903 (1998). 

[2] CLEO Collab., T. Bergfeld et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 830 (2000). 

[3] CLEO Collab., R. Briere et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 26 (2000). 

[4] CLEO Collab., R. Ammar et al, submitted to Phys. Rev. Lett, LANL |hep-ex/U106U3^ . 

[5] CLEO Collab., V. Savinov et al, Phys. Rev. D63, 051101 (2001). 

[6] CLEO Collab., Y. Kubota et al, Nucl lustrum. Methods A320, 66 (1992). 

[7] T. Hill, Nucl lustrum. Methods A418, 32 (1998). 

[8] CLEO Collab., C. Bebek et al, Nucl lustrum. Methods A302, 261 (1992). 

[9] R. Brun et al, GEANT 3.15, CERN Report No. DD/EE/84-1 (1987). 

[10] A. Kagan and M. Neubert, Phys. Rev. D58, 094012 (1998). 

[11] CLEO Collab., T.E. Coan et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5661 (2001). 

[12] CLEO Collab., S. Chen et al, submitted to Phys. Rev. Lett, LANL |hep-ex/0108US^ 

[13] CLEO Collab., M. Artuso et al, Phys. Rev. Lett 84, 4292 (2000). 

[14] CLEO Collab., T.E. Coan et al, Phys. Rev. Lett 84, 5283 (2000). 

[15] CLEO Collab., D.E. Jaffe et al, Phys. Rev. Lett 86, 5000 (2001). 

[16] CLEO Collab., B.H. Behrens et al, Phys. Lett B490, 36 (2000). 

[17] CDF Collab., F. Abe et al, Phys. Rev. D55, 2546 (1997). 

[18] OPAL Collab., K. Ackerstaff et al, Zeit fur Physik C76, 401 (1997). 



9 



[19] K. Kiers et al, Phys.Rev. D59, 096001 (1999); 

G.-H. Wu and A. Soni, Phys.Rev. D62, 056005 (2000). 



[20' 
[21 
[22 
[23 
[24 
[25 
[26 
[27; 
[28 

[29 
[30 
[31 

[32 
[33 
[34 
[35 
[36 



CLEO Collab., G. Bonvicini et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 5940 (2000). 
CLEO Collab., S. Chen et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 525 (2000). 
A. Ali et al, Phys. Rev. D59, 014005 (1999). 

CLEO Collab., S. Anderson et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3823 (1998). 
D. Atwood and A. Soni, Phys. Rev. D45, 2405 (1992). 



CLEO Collab., P. Avery et al, submitted to Phys. Rev. D, LANL |hep-ex/ 01 04009 
Y. Grossman, Nucl Phys. B426, 355 (1994). 

CLEO Collab., approved preliminary result, to be submitted to Phys. Rev. Lett.. 

CLEO Collab., D. Cronin-Hennessy et al, approved preliminary results, CLEO CONF- 
01-1, LANL |hep-ex/01020U5|. 



CLEO Collab., G. Bonvicini et al, Phys. Rev. D63, 071101 (2001). 
F. Bucella et. al, Phys. Rev. D51, 3478 (1995). 

CLEO-c and CESR-s Working Group, "CLEO-c and CESR-c: A new frontier of weak 
and strong interactions", Cornell preprint CLNS 01/1742, available on the CLEO-c 
project WWW page: www.lns.corneN.edu/public/CLEO/spoke/CLEOc/ProjDesc.htmL 

CLEO Collab., R. Godang et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 5038 (2000). 

FOCUS Collab., J.M. Link et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 2955 (2001). 

CLEO Collab., G. Brandenburg et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 071802 (2001). 

CLEO Collab., S. Anderson et al, submitted to Phys. Rev. Lett., LANL |hep-ex/010bObU| . 

A. Ah et al, Phys. Rev. D61, 074024 (2000). 



10